Re: Moderation

[lesherjt@vuse.vanderbilt.edu]

From: lesherjt@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (John Lesher)
Subject: Re: Moderation
Date: 25 Jul 1996 17:32:49 GMT

Nathan Mates (nathan@parka.winternet.com) wrote:
: In article <4sv62l$mmm@news.vanderbilt.edu>,
: John Lesher <lesherjt@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
: >Nathan Mates (nathan@parka.winternet.com) wrote:
: >:    In the rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated, the computer program
: >: handling the moderation allows posts to get through almost
immediately
: >: if you're on the 'automoderated' list-- the moderators have decided
: >: that that person posts reasonably often enough, so their posts are
: >: approved automatically. (Should they abuse that, they can be moved
to
: >: handmod)

: >	So, a not-unreasonable question to ask is,
: >	Which list would you be on, Mr. Mates?
: >	'Automoderated'?  Or 'handmoderated'?

:    Automod. The troublemakers have never bothered trying to show up
: and post their drivel, so there's no need to clean up after them.

Remember the time you jumped all over that guy's ass for
not liking Appleworks Classic and wanting to buy WordPerfect GS?

It wasn't so long ago, yet you seem to forget this.

As per my original suggestion, if we have a moderated Apple II 
newsgroup, let's make sure it's moderated by someone who NEVER
gets involved with the flame wars.

I'm sure there's a few out there.....

Tilghman



Message-ID: <4t8b41$29o@news.vanderbilt.edu>