Re: New Apple II (was Apple's next move ...)

[rubywand@aol.com (RUBYWAND)]

In article <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960510101815.19891A-100000@ns1.net-gate.com>,
Forrest <forrest@ns1.net-gate.com> writes:

>
>>     However, there are several ways for a "New PM" strategy to bomb.
>
>> 4. New PM could omit II series support.
>
>     ?!
>     People buy computers to run software.
>     What Apple II programs are good enough to buy the computer for?
>     AppleWorks?  Deja II's got that base covered already.
>     What else is there?

     Certainly, there is no Apple II software or collection of software
which merits spending $1500-$2000 on a new super Apple II-- not when you
can spend $300-$500 and have a IIgs which will run it all just fine.

     You may believe that II compatibility is, in the final analysis, more
bother than it's worth-- a silly, unnecessary anachronism. Many users may
agree. Evidently, many others disagree.

     It may be tempting to tag the pro-compatibility position with labels
like "unrealistic", "sentimental", and "petulant". On the other hand,
there is more to II compatibility than just running old II software:

    (1) II compatibility preserves the value of hard-won II programming
and development skills.

    (2) II compatibility preserves the value of ongoing ambitious software
development projects.

    (3) II compatibility is a useful bridge in the smooth transition from
old to new.

    (4) Schools and similar institutional users have a large investment in
current II wares. They do not ordinarily buy computers at swap meets and
thrift shops; and, so, they will place a high value upon downward
compatibility in a new machine.

    (5) It is easier to find good work area space for one computer than
for two.

    (6) II compatibility is strong evidence of Apple commitment to the
Apple II series.


     The claim is that Apple's new super home computer must be
II-compatible in order to win broad II user support. If all of the above
mean nothing, there is this: those who insist upon II compatibility will
not enthusiastically support a machine offering anything less.        

     Apple should aim for II compatibility because many II users demand
it.


Rubywand