[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Curiosity about Apple II designations

Subject: Re: Curiosity about Apple II designations
From: treiter@comet.net (Toby Reiter)
Date: 1996/03/30
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Earlysville Apple II User's Group
References: <Dp1Frt.Co6@serval.net.wsu.edu>

In article <Dp1Frt.Co6@serval.net.wsu.edu>, mkelsey@eecs.wsu.edu (Michael
Kelsey) wrote:

>I have often wondered why Apple called the //c the //c and the //e the //e.
>I am guessing the //c represented 'compact,' and the //e 'expandable.'  What
>does the 'gs' in IIgs stand for, maybe 'graphics and sound?'
Exactly.

-- 
"Happy trails to you, until..we meet...again......."
                   ___________
                         |OBYLARONIOUS
Lover of all things Apple ][.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Curiosity about Apple II designations
  - From: wernst@cris.com (Warren "Llama" Ernst)

References:
- Curiosity about Apple II designations
  - From: mkelsey@eecs.wsu.edu (Michael Kelsey)

Prev by Date: need Reverend Apple
Next by Date: Re: WTB: IIGS Mouse
Previous by thread: Re: Curiosity about Apple II designations
Next by thread: Re: Curiosity about Apple II designations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread