[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)

Subject: Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
From: jamess@cts.com (Jim Stafford)
Date: 1996/03/28
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: CTS Network Services (CTSNET), San Diego, CA
References: <4j8d8p$7mu@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4jbguf$3pi$1@mhadg.production.compuserve.com>

Tom Zuchowski (71214.1670@CompuServe.COM) wrote:
:  >Today's home user would welcome a machine that
:  >(3) is _not_ PC compatible 

: Help me out here. Why would the home user prefer a system that is 
: unable to run 90% of all the software in the world?

: TomZ

Because I have a 486 pc and compared to my GS it sucks. 

jamess

References:
- Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
  - From: rubywand@aol.com (RUBYWAND)
- Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
  - From: Tom Zuchowski <71214.1670@CompuServe.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
Next by Date: Re: Second View Pro
Previous by thread: Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
Next by thread: Re: Apple's next move (was Apple II just won't die.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread