[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cold Fusion Identity



 That guy once again let the beans talk:

 MN(F| Of course, if I miraculously have the same opinions AFTER Duhwaid
     | posts my life history, I suppose you are both going to look like
     | cretins, no? It ain't flaming if it's true, pal.

Bedraggling a subject at length makes even intelligent people look like
oafs.  And consistantly namecalling (you used the monkier "Duhwawid"
four times in the message I'm replying to) doesn't help any.  And
repeating one's self doesn't make a statement any more true either.

     | Duhwaid could have got my unlisted number (can you say Diz?),

That's between you and Diz how that info got to Jawaid, and that's a
completely different thread and conf.

     | that I was telling the truth all along.

I don't know (or care) enough about the matter, but just because one
person appears to have muffed your order doesn't automatically mean that
that same person commits other grieviences such as passing out personal
info about one's clients.  I can't agree with or doubt you, but it's a
leap to say that one bit of info affirms another like you do above.

 MN(F| As for the thread from hell, I tried to drop it, but Duhwaid and
     | the others kept plugging along. He does not want me to stop, he
     | wants you to say he is right and I am wrong. Diz dropped the
     | whole thing weeks ago, do you see me still writing him messages?

It struck me as weird that the first post of the recent past said that
you'd been AFK for days and the battle raged on -- then you proceeded to
write 5 return flames.  This thread is no longer a matter of who is
right and who is wrong, Fusion, or for the general populous.  If you
have a complaint about a vendor, you have expressed it, fine, and we all
have noted it for our own future reference.  Now the major thrusts are
that the flamewar is taking up bandwidth, and that you and Jawaid are
both positive that you are correct in what you say -- solid, you two
don't agree on certain facts, BOTH of you kindly take it elsewhere??
If it's Apple business, share it here.  If what is said is recrimina-
tions as has been done lately, find an alt.flame group to fill.

I'm in agreement with the people here who say "if you don't like the
thread, don't read it" -- but I also don't think that we should have to
wade through and past it on a daily basis.  We already know what you and
some other people have to say (about facts, about business), so with
that in mind take matters up with the people it all involves, privately.

 * 2qwk! 2.01b7 * Consider the daffodil; I'll be looking through your stuff.
--                                                                   -- 
yet another annoying post by brian.hammack@rook.wa.com -- deal with it.