Re: cold fusion - It's really an AI-DLF

[tots@wrath.ugcs.caltech.edu (Tatsuya Murase)]

kyle@c2.org (Wrecking Machine) writes:

>In article <4almv7$fke@gap.cco.caltech.edu>,
>   tots@wrath.ugcs.caltech.edu (Tatsuya Murase) wrote:

>>What planet are *you* from? 

>I get it.  I don't suck up to EGO systems so I'm from
>another planet.   

No, you don't get it.  Your post contradicted what I'm actually seeing
in my newsspool, and it still does.

>That's not what I see.  I see posts where he has substantiated his
>claim.  Perhaps you are just scrolling by them.  Go look for them
>before posting another response.

I *have* looked for them.  They do not exist.  Substantial evidence is
something of the following:

"On <specific date> I ordered <specific product> from Ego systems.
By <specific date> I had not received said product, thus on <specific date>
I called Ego systems concerning said product."

An actual invoice number would *greatly* substantiate his claim, but since
he hasn't brought when or what he ordered, I don't see how he has a
legitimate claim.

So, point out a message-ID that I can look up for this supposed post where
he substantiates his claims.

>Yeh, sure.  People just pick you out of the blue and slam you for 
>no reason.  

Like "Cold Fusion"?

>Perhaps you are in the habit of doing that, 

It's hard not to given such easy targets.  But after a while, shooting
fish in a barrel becomes tiresome.

>but after
>following the thread for several days, I get the impression that
>someone is just trying to silence a critic as oppossed to addressing
>his well articulated concerns.

"Well-articulated"?  He's spent *most* of the thread making asisine
insults out of other people's names and ending his posts with the
puerile "PUTZ" epithet.  That doesn't qualify as "concerns" much less
"well-articulated" ones.

>Get a life.  You don't even know what slander/libel is.

Indeed, you are incorrect:  I do know what slander and libel are.

--tots

-- 
---------------
tots@ugcs.caltech.edu