[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- From: laurence@netcom.com (Andrew Laurence)
- Date: 1995/09/11
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc, aus.computers.ibm-pc, aus.computers.sun, aus.computers.os2, aus.computers.amiga, comp.sys.amiga.misc, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc, comp.sys.intel, comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc, comp.sys.misc, comp.sys.newton.misc, comp.sys.next.misc, comp.sys.sgi.misc, comp.sys.sun.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup, comp.windows.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc
- Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
- References: <Pine.ULT.3.91.950904132020.12842B-100000@student.uq.edu.au> <42g0e7$kvs@itchy.itsnet.com> <42ndu4$55u@gdls.com> <42o4l7$9qt@news-2.csn.net> <DELHnJ.ELE@ecf.toronto.edu>
- Sender: laurence@netcom17.netcom.com
kromkam@ecf.toronto.edu (KROMKAMP ANDY) writes:
>Even saying that, I think I like Win95. technically speaking, it's WAY
>behind OS/2. But the interface is pretty nice, and little things (like
>3rd parties actually using the RMB functionality, and screen res. changing
>on the fly) are nice too. The main reason to support Win 95? It's a means
>to an end to get to WinNT 2 years from now. and Win NT IS technically
>superior to OS/2, and scaleable to boot :-)
But why wait? Windows NT is available now, and it's EXCELLENT.
--
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Andrew Laurence laurence@netcom.com |
| Certified NetWare Engineer (CNE) Oakland, California, USA |
| Independent Networking Consultant Pacific Standard Time (GMT-8) |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|