[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RamFast 3.01f ???

Subject: Re: RamFast 3.01f ???
From: bazyar@netcom.com (Jawaid Bazyar)
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 1995 00:42:01 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <bongini.185.2F6F459C@law3.law.ucla.edu> <3koda8$ktk@news.blkbox.com>
Sender: bazyar@netcom20.netcom.com

gtolar@blkbox.com (Glynne Tolar) writes:

>3.01f "fixes" the tape backup problem.  The problem was with mounting the 
>tapes images.  They would not mount.  However it now kills the lookahead 
>cache on the tape.  Making it even slower!

  There were approximately 10 bytes of changes between 3.01e and 3.01f,
and none of them could possibly cause the problem you're mentioning.
If it's in 3.01f, it was in 3.01e.

-- 
 Jawaid Bazyar              |   Like UNIX? Like your Apple IIGS? Then ask
 Procyon, Inc.              |   me about GNO/ME for the Apple IIgs!   
 bazyar@netcom.com          |   P.O Box 620334    (Sequential: 303-666-4549)
 --Apple II Forever!--      |   Littleton, CO 80162-0334   (303) 781-3273

References:
- RamFast 3.01f ???
  - From: bongini@law3.law.ucla.edu (STEPHEN BONGINI)
- Re: RamFast 3.01f ???
  - From: gtolar@blkbox.com (Glynne Tolar)

Prev by Date: Re: RamFast 3.01f ???
Next by Date: prodos comm for ii+ wanted
Previous by thread: Re: RamFast 3.01f ???
Next by thread: Re: RamFast 3.01f ???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread