[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WANTED: Apple III info
- Subject: Re: WANTED: Apple III info
- From: grq@icf.hrb.com (Gregory R. Quinn)
- Date: 10 Feb 95 11:27:47 EST
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: HRB Systems, Inc.
- References: <ciwane-0402951447250001@s157.union_roberts.haverford.edu>
In article <ciwane-0402951447250001@s157.union_roberts.haverford.edu>, ciwane@haverford.edu (Christopher Iwane) writes:
> I got my first computer, an Apple IIGS, in fifth grade (1985?). It was
> way neat-o. Had one of them 3.5" drives, 256Kb, and a Woz signature on
> the front. For years and years I used that computer and waited for Apple
> to release the Apple III.
>
> Anyway, Apple opted to go for the Mac and the wonderful Apple III never
> was released...or so I thought. A few months back, while rooting through
> some boxes in the computer room of my elementary school I found brittle,
> yellowed, slightly shredded poster with some computer I had never seen
> before. It looked as if it was a one-piece affair with built in
> floppies. I looked closely at it and it said "Apple III."
>
> I've been trying to find out whatever I can about this machine. The only
> think I know is that the thing obviously was dead on arrival as it's no
> longer around.
>
> What are the specs on the Apple III? Was it a minor mistake or a huge
> debacle? Any books, or articles on the Apple III or on Apple Computer
> which discuss the Apple III? Anyone have any old promotional material?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Chris Iwane
>
> --
> ciwane@haverford.edu
> "Fly Jefferson Airplane."
The Apple III was a beast of a machine that was released approx. the time IBM
was releasing their 128K machine. The neat thing about the III was that it was
a Pascal based computer with a forerunner of ProDOS. The dual processors gave
it some nice performance. The cost was a bit high and deep down I am not sure
that Apple was committed behind the machine vs. the IIe. The basic concept of
the III had longevity built into it but the was not support in depth. I recall
that the problems were hardware; its II compatibility was okay but you had to
go into a II emulation mode so operating II software was not transparent.
Man, do I feel old.