[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?

Subject: Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
From: Polymorph <mike.a.stephens@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:10:29 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=125.255.46.67; posting-account=qIru1woAAADyrRDY5lcZvu3e6Ewu4WLS
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <1a4b340e-e2ce-4885-b5a6-e7fb088f4944@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <8cc243d0-f879-4ee9-a853-77926c010d94@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <20f97638-445f-45ba-8542-12e7239b9311@p24g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <aabb86a4-337e-4bd5-82c3-5a2412a8aa05@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:13660

On Jan 19, 11:42 am, sporadic <sporadica...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Drew, I'll check it out this week and post the results.  TWGS
> is has more hardware (10Mhz/32K) than the ZipGS (8MHz/16K) and I'm
> going to see if someone at work can solder a socket on the Zip so I
> can swap the oscillator, put in a new 65816 and take it to 64K cache
> as well.

My adventures at upgrading my Zip GSX a couple of years ago might be
of some interest to you too:
http://apple2.sytes.net/ZIP_GSX_Mod/index.html

Cheers,
Mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: sporadic <sporadically@gmail.com>

References:
- Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: sporadic <sporadically@gmail.com>
- Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: Drew <goggledrew@gmail.com>
- Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: Drew <goggledrew@gmail.com>
- Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
  - From: sporadic <sporadically@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Buying equipment?
Next by Date: Re: Serial Link between Mac and IIgs
Previous by thread: Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
Next by thread: Re: Which would you keep: ZipGSX or TWGS?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread