[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCSI Partition question
- Subject: Re: SCSI Partition question
- From: dreamer@ods.sol.net
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 94 00:10:54 EST
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Online Data Systems, Milw., WI 414-761-5120
IS>If the new drive is slower than your old hard drives then perhaps
IS>your interleave is not optimally set. Most drives are low level
IS>formatted these days with a 1:1 interleave. I believe that on your
IS>IIe your interleave should probably be greater than this -- although
IS>you didn't indicate what type of SCSI adapter you have. I assume it
IS>isn't a RamFAST since you didn't mention using the RamFAST built-in
IS>utilities. If you have an old Apple Rev. C SCSI adapter then you
IS>definitely will need to adjust your interleave -- this requires a
IS>low level format.
Having just had to go through this obnoxious process, I think I can
help. First of all, I had originally formatted it with a 1:1
interleave, using the SCSI HD Utils V0.98 or somesuch thing. It's a
290+Mb CDC HD. I managed, with ProDOS 2.0.3 on a //e, to get 7
partitions. However, I found that it was intolerably slower than my
older, smaller (80Mb) HDs, and so I asked a friend about it. He
suggested this:
1)Format your HD with a 1:1 interleave. (partition it too)
2)Copy a LARGE file onto it (I used a, I believe, 1000 block file). Time
how long it takes to copy the file onto the HD.
3)Copy that same file to either a different directory or partition on
the same HD and time it.
4) You ARE writing these times down, aren't you? BTW - I suggest using
Cat Dr., which seems to be faster than Copy II Plus.
5) Reformat it at 2:1 interleave. Go to step 2.
At some point, you will notice that your times are starting to increase
again. When this happens, STOP! You've found the best interleave.
In my case, I had a bit of a quandry. At 3:1, it copied the file within
the HD faster, but at 4:1 it copied the file TO the HD faster. It was a
trade-off, and since it's for a BBS, and I do more transferring from
disk to HD (or whatever) rather than moving files about the HD, I opted
for the 3:1 interleave.
NOTE: at 1:1 I could NOT copy files within the HD.
Hope this helps someone!
Glenn
Lord Wilderness
--
Online Data Systems - Milwaukee, WI
(414) 761-5120 - 300/1200/2400
(414) 761-5133 - 9600/14400
(414) 939-4670 - SouthEastern WI