[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Net piracy?
- Subject: Re: Net piracy?
- From: daye@odo.CSOS.ORST.EDU (Critical Mass)
- Date: 20 Jul 1994 03:20:48 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: CS Outreach Services, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
- References: <30eanp$65q@bmerha64.bnr.ca> <30fidi$bvt@crl4.crl.com> <30gu02$a2a@netaxs.com> <30h3ce$95u@wsu-cs.cs.wayne.edu>
In article <30h3ce$95u@wsu-cs.cs.wayne.edu>,
Bertha Ramirez <ber@siva.cs.wayne.edu> wrote:
>In article <30gu02$a2a@netaxs.com> rak@netaxs.com (User Support) writes:
>>You people are losing sight of the target. Cassandra archive included,
>>among other things, Proterm. This is NOT a 'lost classic', nor is it
>>'not available anywhere else', etc.
>>
>>If you need to be convinced that software piracy is theft despite the
>>fact that the owner of the property "doesn't lose anything... he still
>>has possession", I suggest you look up the laws regarding "theft of
>>service" and see if that doesn't poke a few holes in your arguments.
>
>Everyone keeps mentioning that ProTERM was on Casandra. WHO CARES. IT
>COULD NOT BE USED BY THE EMULATOR, AND I DON'T THINK THAT THERE IS A WAY
>TO PUT THOSE IMAGES BACK ONTO DISK.
>
>Piracy is wrong, and most of those games on that site were pirate games,
>but if you read the documentation, they were all there for testing
>purposes!
>
Uh, actually, you can put the images back on disks. It's trivial to do.
And I don't see how using them for 'testing purposes' justifies making
copywritten software available w/o a license on FTP.
--
|Evan Day | "Plans made in the nursery can change the
|daye@CSOS.ORST.EDU | course of history. Remember that."
|"Redneckers, they get us| - M. L. Gore
| pissed" - Black Francis| They've got the guns but we've got the numbers.