[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

II Alive? A bunch of morons?



	Is it just my imagination or does II Alive have a large number
of mistakes, type-o's, and other screwy happenings? I was reading the new
issue today and found, in 10 minutes of casual reasing, about 10 mistakes,
the worst being using the word "maid" for "made". I found a few
typographical errors, too, which bother me to no end because it's been,
what, a year now and they still haven't figured out this publishing thing. I
wish they would get a "real" proofreader (someone who can spell?)... In any
case, if anyone from Quality is reading this... CLEAN UP YOUR ACT! Ok! Other
than the sloppiness, I like the magazine!

-- 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
		 Jason Jeffries / jaj4922@fert2.fe.psu.edu
   Industrial Revolution BBS   412-437-1718    METAL/FV with Supra 14.4k
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++