[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I'm Baaack (UNIX for 64 Thread)

Subject: Re: I'm Baaack (UNIX for 64 Thread)
From: toddpw@ugcs.caltech.edu (Todd P. Whitesel)
Date: 6 Dec 1993 10:04:22 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.apple2
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
References: <2D001126.10660@news.service.uci.edu> <CHLJ9M.9uw@trc.amoco.com>
Xref: gmd.de comp.sys.cbm:9214 comp.sys.apple2:36897

zklf0b@gs87.hou.amoco.com (Fergason) writes:

>I believe a 32bit 6502 would be awesome.

I believe the ARM cpu family was original designed to _be_ a 32bit 6502, and
went from there. You might want to check it out, since it's what's in the
Newton.

Todd Whitesel
toddpw @ ugcs.caltech.edu

References:
- Re: I'm Baaack (UNIX for 64 Thread)
  - From: andrep@balboa.eng.uci.edu (Andre Prellwitz)
- Re: I'm Baaack (UNIX for 64 Thread)
  - From: zklf0b@gs87.hou.amoco.com (Fergason)

Prev by Date: Re: Firmware/Software for homebrew IDE HDC.
Next by Date: Re: "The Apple II is DEAD" - Long Live the Apple II
Previous by thread: Re: I'm Baaack (UNIX for 64 Thread)
Next by thread: Patents (Re: I'm Baaack (UNIX for 64 Thread))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread