[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple2 archive at grind.isca.uiowa.edu
In article <284pjfINN9sg@srvr1.engin.umich.edu> dmag@engin.umich.edu (Daniel Demaggio ) writes:
>
>1) Which do you want?
> A) indexes for each subdirectory
> B) indexes (i.e. foobar.txt) for each file
> C) one global index
From: andrep@balboa.eng.uci.edu (Andre Prellwitz)
>
>My vote is to have indices for each directory with 1-4 line comments on each
>file, then one global index in the main directory with simple 30-40 character
>description. The global index should be a "quick map" to the actual file you
>are looking for. Its format could be as follows:
>
>/apple2/system/cdevs/:
>ZipGSCDev.SHK 13542 May 5'92 Controls the Zip GS from desktop
>PhantasmDemo.SHK 245345 Apr 9'92 Screen blankers. v3.1
> .
> .
> .
>/apple2/system/fonts/:
>BarCode12.SHK 23879 Jun23'93 A font for barcode scanners
> .
> etc.
___
|his would get my vote, also. If not possible, then (A).
>2) Do you want
> A) BSQ files only
> B) SHK files only
> C) Both SHK & BSQ in same directory
> D) Both SHK & BSQ in seperate trees
][ would go for (B), SHK only. As long as there's only a
single, consistent format, though, it doesn't matter so much
to me.
>3) Should the archive have:
> A) 16 char filenames for all files
> B) longer filenames (i.e. more descriptive)
|)efinitely stick to 15 characters or less, especially if they're
all SHK. (Ever accidentally open a SHK into a word processor
because it came down as a text file, with no Binary II, and the name
was too long so it lost the SHK suffix? Very annoying.) At least
with a BSQ file you can look at it and be able to tell immeditately
what it is.
_
/-\lso, if the site is maintained properly, with a good subdirectory
order, then you don't need to worry so much about the file names.
--
______________________________________________________
/ -= Lunatic Johnathan Bruce E'Sex [Full, legal name] / "Hellooooooo,
_/ lunatic@netcom.com GEnie: LUNATIC (: /_ NURSE!!!"