[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SoundSmith shareware fees
In a previous article, philip@utstat.toronto.edu (Philip McDunnough) says:
>Why not support those people involved in the GS music arena...SoundSmith as
>a musical composition tool is a joke ( I believe we have already had this
>debate). The best thing one could do would be to encourage development of
>SynthLab based programs ( have a look at Bard's Tales I and II and DWGS),
>encourage the Mod supporters to have translators and editors going, etc...
>SoundSmith is a poor excuse of a musical program, and certainly as a midi
>sequencer/editor one can't take it seriously.
The real answer should be "If you're using a Shareware product, pay the fee"
I don't think the author's future plans should enter into the argument.
--
Eric S. Ford ag471@yfn.ysu.edu