[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Ram-Fast vs. Turbo IDE was (Re: RAM-Fast happy and sad)



In article <241jl4$cs5@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> szatezal@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Shane M Zatezalo) writes:
>In article <Aug.7.20.22.14.1993.14271@trident.usacs.rutgers.edu> scraft@trident.usacs.rutgers.edu (Steve Craft) writes:
>>
>>I got a RAM-Fast 256k board (revD) from LRO to go with my funny 220meg
>>HP mechanism in my Pegasus.  Works well, but I can't tell if it's faster
>>than the Apple HighSpeed SCSI in GS/OS, but it is MUCH faster when I ran
>>AppleWorks v3.0.
>
>I'd have to think its a LOT faster. For a while, I had two gs's. One running
>the bbs (with a maxxed out rev d) and the other running a normal rev d
>ramfast. The bbs setup was much quicker, even when running the same programs
>with the same cdevs/inits/ds's loaded up. I'd almost guarantee that its
>faster than your apple scsi card.


  How does the RAM-Fast card stack up to the Turbo IDE card??? 

                       Curious, 

                         Joe

-- 
Joseph W. Blas   | "suburbs have no charms |Apple-----  -----   -----  -----
blasjw@ntmtv.com |  to soothe the restless |      /      /     /  __  /____
Northern Telecom |  dreams of youth"       |     /      /     /    /      / 
Mt. View, CA     |  - Neil Peart           |   -----  -----   -----  -----Rules!