[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2 year olds on the net.
In article <gqo03B1w165w@qedbbs.com> jon@qedbbs.com (Jonathan Fether) writes:
>I feel like I'm talking to a group of 90% 2 year olds who think that they
>deserve respect (Of whom, most of the time, I respect them and read their
You appear to think you deserve respect, too.
>posts) some deal of these 2 year olds apparently have more respect for
>FVnet (Thet's where they are!) than for me. I am a human being and I do
>realise people decided to read posts by 1 year-olds (Hereby referred to
>as FETHER-FLAMMERS) and suddenly decided to listen to them and plug their
>ears on me. Of the few I've noticed do this is Joe Kohn. Now now, what
People are allowed to hold their own opinions. Why do you feel that you
are more deserving of support than those who flame you?
>to see C.S.A2 crash. So please act more like adults (Joe Kohn is one) and
>pay attention to everybody.
Do you really think c.s.a2 is going to "crash" simply because you have
been criticized? You do not really want readers to pay attention to
everybody, because earlier in the paragraph you berated posters who
listened to "FETHER-FLAMES" (oh excuse me, "FLAMMS":) and agreed with
them. You only want people to see your views.
>Due to high amounts of FETHER-FLAMMING on the net, I propose that we give
>the 2-year-olds a crib called "comp.sys.apple2.flamewars". The poor
>intellect of these 2-year-olds is deteriorating from the intellegent
>posts.
In other words, you feel that anyone who disagrees with you is unintelligent
and shouldn't post here.
>If you're offended by this, your diaper needs changing, Sculley-liker!
What are you trying to imply - that those who do not share your opinions
are against the Apple II?
Jason Simmons
jsimmons@sbcs.sunysb.edu