[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MS-DOS FST?

Subject: Re: MS-DOS FST?
From: jmk3@crux3.cit.cornell.edu (Jay Krell)
Date: 29 Apr 93 04:38:43 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Cornell University
References: <1993Apr28.000007.13722@osl.or.gov> <jmk3.735970979@crux1.cit.cornell.edu> <C67oJI.EqI@utstat.toronto.edu>
Sender: usenet@piccolo.cit.cornell.edu (NNTP Connect)

>But when transferring a program to a foreign OS, all the information ( about
>a Windows' program) gets tranferred in one data part. None of this division
>into 2. So, I can install and run Windows' programs on a NeXT running an
 
I read in a Call-Apple from when the IIGS was introduced that Apple was
thinking of implementing resources and that they'd probably be in an OMF
segment. Maybe this would make it too difficult to recompile the code while
leaving the resources alone, though, and vice versa.
 

--
  --Jay, jay.krell@cornell.edu

References:
- Re: MS-DOS FST?
  - From: visitor@ednet1.osl.or.gov (Compass Guest)
- Re: MS-DOS FST?
  - From: jmk3@crux3.cit.cornell.edu (Jay Krell)
- Re: MS-DOS FST?
  - From: philip@utstat.toronto.edu (Philip McDunnough)

Prev by Date: Re: DHR graphics can be good (was Re: Bill Budge & pinball)
Next by Date: Wanted: Ultima V
Previous by thread: Re: MS-DOS FST?
Next by thread: Re: MS-DOS FST?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread