[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Possible reorganisation of comp.sys.apple2 hierarchy



In article <C25JvC.JoA@news.iastate.edu> irsman@iastate.edu (Ian Schmidt) writes:
>
>Given that a fair number of c.s.a2 readers/posts come from INFO.APPLE, ProLine,
>and soon METAL/FutureVision, and that the admins of all those systems will
>certainly be on the ball, I'd say that a majority of users wouldn't be affected
>.

    Even if the network were perfect and everyone responded to the
change and no one tried posting to csa2 again, I don't see the reason
for a change.  Changing comp.sys.apple to comp.sys.apple2 was valid.
Changing comp.sys.apple2 to comp.sys.apple2.misc, IMHO, is not.  The
.misc is redundant.

>More importantly, we need more groups so the Amigoids
>can't bash us so hard over the head with their 10+ groups vs. our 4 ;-)

    Just ask them about comp.sys.amiga.software.pirate... ;-)
-- 
-- Real name:  Brian Tao (Dept. of Exobiology, University of Toronto)
-- SemiStable: 90taobri@chasm.scar.utoronto.ca (checked daily)
-- Alternate:  taob@r-node.pci.on.ca (no mail over 15K, please!)
--                                    """""""""""""""""""""""""