Re: LLUCE vs. METAL: A losing battle

[szatezal@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Shane M Zatezalo)]

In article <9302021601.AA12524@chasm.scar.utoronto.ca> 90taobri@chasm.scar.utoronto.ca (Brian Tao) writes:
>The following revelation escaped Ron Dippold's lips:
>> 
>> It's a legitimate complaint - you will notice he didn't claim it was a
>> piece of worthless crap, rather that he took the time to make the
>> mentioned changes, which would seem to imply that he felt the software
>> was worth something.
>
>    Interesting point... if there was really something lacking in METAL,
>I would think Greg Berigan would have used that as an example.  But
>since he complained about a rather minor "feature", my interpretation
>would be that METAL overall is an excellent system with very little to
>complain about.

 Actually, wasn't he complaining about Futurevision and not Metal? (there's
 a big difference there)

::::::::Apple II forever!!:::::::GO BUCKS!::::::::Play Lacrosse!!::::::::::
:   Shane M. Zatezalo         : i-net> szatezal@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu :
:   CIS Eng Ohio State        : NeXTMail>  shane@kiwi.swhs.ohio-state.edu :
:GS::: call T.A.P. a Futurenet BBS 614-297-7031 16.8k DS HST 425 MEGS ::GS: