[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FORTRAN 77 compiler
- Subject: Re: FORTRAN 77 compiler
- From: gdesroch@slate.mines.colorado.edu (DESROCHERS GARY FREDERIC)
- Date: 8 Dec 92 21:59:56 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Colorado School of Mines
- References: <viking.723342075@vincent1.iastate.edu>
viking@iastate.edu (Dan Sorenson) writes:
: glyn@cs.UAlberta.CA (Reade Glyn Devin) writes:
:
: >If so, where can I get, is it free/share/commercial-ware, etc?
:
: Wander on over to your nearest Unix mini and look for the
: source. Under BSD4.3 Unix, the source for the fortran compiler is
: written in C. Looks to be 100% written in C, too.
Look for f2c. It is a fortran to C compiler. I started porting
it over on my machine because of all the fortran I write at work and school
but ORCA/C didn't want to port it very well. I was going to wait for the
new ORCA/C.
:
: >Who feels that there is a use for a FORTRAN 77 compiler that
: >would work under ORCA/GNO? Should it be FORTRAN 90?
:
: I don't think there is a strong need; FORTRAN is primarially
: the realm of serious number crunchers, engineers, and the like. I've
: not found a need to code in FORTRAN since I was a freshman in college.
: Were I to implement such a beast, though, I'd probably stick with
: fortran 77 as it's very well standardized; 90 hasn't come on strong
: yet. Furthermore, if you run it under ORCA/GNO, I'd be very selective
: on what additions were made for graphical work.
f2c is FORTRAN 90. If you are going to do it. Do it right.
: < Dan Sorenson, DoD #1066 z1dan@exnet.iastate.edu viking@iastate.edu >
Gary
gdesroch@slate.mines.colorado.edu
--
Gary F. Desrochers
gdesroch@slate.mines.colorado.edu