[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SEAs?
In article <92321.123328TS8RBOTW@MIAMIU.BITNET> Radagast <TS8RBOTW@MIAMIU.BITNET> writes:
>Why are Sefl-Extracting Archives (particularly GSHK) called self-
>extracting when they don't? That's annoying having to change the
>file type and aux type like we have to do with GSHK. Is GSHK the
>only SEA like that, or do all have to be manipulated? GSHK is the
>only SEA I've ever seen.
>
>Just curious...
> ...Tim
I downloaded my copy of GSHK 1.1 from GEnie. All I had to do was double click
on it and viola! A new copy of GSHK 1.1, no hassles, no mess. I believe the
copy that U/L on the NET was corrupted or something. But the SEA I got worked
fine.
--Mark
--
*****************************************************************************
* Mark Allen Northwestern Univ * "This death star is now the ultimate *
* M_ALLEN@NUACC (Bitnet) * power in the universe." & "The power *
* mallen@casbah.acns.nwu.edu * to destroy a planet is insignificant *
* GEnie: M.ALLEN15 * compared with power of the Force." *
*****************************************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SEAs?
- From: isc10327@nusunix1.nus.sg (ONG TAT-WEE)
- References:
- SEAs?
- From: Radagast <TS8RBOTW@MIAMIU.BITNET>