[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TWGS vs. ZipChip
- Subject: Re: TWGS vs. ZipChip
- From: Pauley@vnet.ibm.com (Paul Benson)
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 92 15:42:20 EST
- Disclaimer: This posting represents my views, not necessarily IBM's.
- News-software: UReply 3.0
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: IBM Personal Computer Co. - PS/1 Development
- References: <1cn33pINNiqd@gap.caltech.edu> <BwwE1A.3MF@well.sf.ca.us> <Bwy1y7.KA6@well.sf.ca.us> <1992Nov2.180529.9293@b8.b8.ingr.com>
In <1992Nov2.180529.9293@b8.b8.ingr.com> Scott Gentry writes:
>posty@socs.uts.edu.au (Andrew Roughan) writes:
>>the FPE is _not_ compatible with the TWGS.
>
>Sorry, but I'm going to disagree with you. I've been running an FPE and
>a TWGS since TWGS came out and it's fine.
It depends how old your FPE is. I only noticed mine was 'bad' when I used
some of the FPE intensive graphing functions (demos) in Prosel-16's
calculator. I was told that I needed to get my FPE updated; unfortunately,
IS does not return my calls, so I've been unable to get the update :(.
Pauley
GEnie: P.Benson1