[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GS/OS FST
- Subject: Re: GS/OS FST
- From: dlyons@Apple.COM (David A Lyons)
- Date: 3 Nov 92 04:50:10 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA
- References: <m0miqly-0001PAC@crash.cts.com> <1cca0aINN7ah@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu> <AWILLIS.92Nov1041412@posse.mit.edu>
In article <AWILLIS.92Nov1041412@posse.mit.edu> awillis@athena.mit.edu (Albert Willis) writes:
>Perhaps I missed the last thread....what advantages would a 'GS/OS' FST have
>vs. a HFS FST?
The potential advantage is mainly speed.
>Why would IIgs owners want to deal with yet another file system? What would
>Apple's customers have to gain from this? What about compatibility with the
>rest of the industry?
Yet Another File System--my sentiments exactly. A new not-compatible-with-
anthing file system would bring unnecessary confusion to the world, as well
as needing new experts & utilities for disk repair.
Such a project is *technically* interesting to me, but not interesting in
practice. There's much more pressing stuff to do.
--
David A. Lyons, Apple Computer, Inc. | DAL Systems
Apple II System Software Engineer | P.O. Box 875
Internet:dlyons@apple.com | Cupertino, CA 95015-0875
My opinions are my own, not Apple's.