Re: Ciderpress for OS/X?

[Zaleski <skierpaul@yahoo.com>]

On Aug 11, 4:08 pm, datajerk <dataj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2:46 pm, Alex Freed <alex_n...@mirrow.com> wrote:
>
> > Bill Buckels wrote:
>
> > > Another nice thing about Aztec C is the shear number of library routines
> > > that are kicking-around for the Apple II. Bite me, but this really is easy
> > > isn't it?
>
> > Did anyone compare the code generated by Aztec with that from cc65? I'm
> > more concerned about  the size than the speed.
>
> > -Alex.
>
> I tried, but I could not get cc65 to compile my code.  It errors with
> too many local variables.  So I gave up.  But I would like to compare
> the speed of my pi.c program.  cc65 vs Aztec. mano-a-mano.

Let us know of your benchmarks, this would be a good one.  It'd be
nice to get a Kyan benchmark vs. these two as well.  I'd think C would
get the edge, but a cool test nevertheless.

- Paul