Re: CFFA for IIc and IIc+?

[Sheppy <the.sheppy@gmail.com>]

On Apr 9, 1:22 am, "Simon D. Williams" <ad...@retro-net.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Sheppy wrote:
> > Well, what I'm looking for is the smallest possible footprint in terms
> > of desk space for writing 5.25" disks to fill orders.  Right now, I'm
>
> I don't think it would make much difference... if you use the IIc's
> built-in drive you need 6" of clear desk space for disk insertion...
> about the same as you'd need for a IIc+ with a 5.25" drive on teh side.>

Oh, sure, get all logical on me. :)

The difference is, though, that the IIc can sit at the edge of my desk
and the insertion can take place over my floor instead of desk space.
Although realistically that's not where it would be positioned, so
your argument holds. :)

However, with no external keyboard to deal with, the IIc would still
have smaller footprint than the IIgs, I think.

Sheppy