Re: network booting

[ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt)]

Hi Glenn,

>> I see, but you need to know that the Uthernet card doesn't work in a
>> typical ][+ (most likely) because of slightly different CPU timings.

>I think there are folks out there using the Uthernet in a II+ 
>successfully

I'm pretty sure I was even the first one ;-)

>but it does require a 6502A.

So it's not a "typical" ][+ anymore... I wasn't aware that the issues
where conclusively assigned to the 6502 vs. 6502A differences. If that
is the case then everybody with a ][+ can turn it quite easily into
Uthernet-compatible :-)

>There have been more 
>compatibility issues with the unenhanced //e's that needed to have a 
>65C02 added.

I see. Thanks for the info.

Best, Oliver