Re: Testaus

[Eric Rucker <bhtooefr@gmail.com>]

Well, processing time on some heavier stuff could make the //e consume
significantly more power for a given amount of processing than, say,
something with an Intel Atom. We're talking somewhere around 10-15W
typical on that, with a highly efficient power supply (like one of the
picoPSUs.)

On Dec 14, 7:44 pm, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:
> Gav wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 3:48 pm, Turo Alatalo <alat...@echo.com> wrote:
> >> Sähkö   [Jukka Lukkari,  14.05.2008]
>
> >> Sähkön kulutus jatkaa laskuaan
> >> Sähkön kulutus jäi huhtikuussa runsaan prosentin edellisvuotta pienemmäksi.
> >> Vuoden neljän ensimmäisen kuukauden aikana sähköä on Suomessa kulunut 32,3
> >> gigawattituntia eli yli kaksi prosenttia viime vuotta vähemmän.
>
> >> Aika hurjaa pudotusta kun enmnakoitiin viiko sitten teolisuuspiireissämme
> >> mitä löie +10% lisää ja nyt tuo väittää jo -6% vuosilaskua!!! Kuka siis
> >> valehtelee maasamme ydinhallinnon lisäksi?!
>
> > I'm pretty sure energy consumption is falling as a result of less and
> > less real Apple II's being used in Finland these days. Well done
> > everyone, its good to see the Apple II community helping to save the
> > planet.
>
> So that's what the post was about??!  Cool.
>
> BTW, if you want to save energy and compute, you should switch from
> a modern computer to an Apple //e--average power consumption (w/o any
> additional boards) is less than 5W.
>
> It may not run iTunes or be a good graphical web browser, but for
> the pure fun of developing programs, it can't be beat.
>
> The 17-board AppleCrate II consumes about 75W total!
>
> -michael
>
> ******** Note new website URL ********
>
> NadaNet and AppleCrate II for Apple II parallel computing!
> Home page:  http://home.comcast.net/~mjmahon/
>
> "The wastebasket is our most important design
> tool--and it's seriously underused."