[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Videx question

Subject: Re: Videx question
From: mojoehand <jgray@zianet.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 11:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: d10g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.35.155.85; posting-account=f-SuQwoAAAByEUoxZhjoARrzydbcwcU8
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <3910692e-0a42-448b-8374-5f511dc277dd@i18g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <IICdnTMYraH3n5PUnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@giganews.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:4280

On Nov 2, 12:41 pm, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:
> The video generated by the Videx card devotes more scan lines and more
> pixels per line to text than the Apple //e, so improving the //e font
> is not "in the cards".  ;-)

What about my other question? Can a Videx be made to coexist with a
64K/80-col card by somehow disabling the 80-col feature of the IIe
card? Will this cause problems with other software?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Videx question
  - From: Steven Hirsch <snhirsch@gmail.com>
- Re: Videx question
  - From: mdj <mdj.mdj@gmail.com>
- Re: Videx question
  - From: Alex Freed <alex_news@mirrow.com>

References:
- Videx question
  - From: mojoehand <jgray@zianet.com>
- Re: Videx question
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Videx question
Next by Date: Re: Returning Apple User
Previous by thread: Re: Videx question
Next by thread: Re: Videx question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread