[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ADT / ADTPro and accelerators
- Subject: ADT / ADTPro and accelerators
- From: schmidtd <schmidtd@my-deja.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
- Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
- Injection-info: 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.33.49.251; posting-account=_InY0QkAAABEJlD5gzff1o2kxpwa79I3
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: http://groups.google.com
- User-agent: G2/1.0
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:2496
In his review of ADTPro in Juiced.GS, Mike Maginnis mentioned that
ADTPro failed to transfer correctly at the highest baud rates when 3rd
party accelerators were used in non-GS machines. I don't happen to
have a ZipChip or similar to test myself, so I hadn't seen that
before. My accelerated GS and IIc+ will run fine at top speed. But I
have every reason to believe Mike, because in the Apple /// I
borrowed, I had to clock it back to 1MHz during serial I/O to get it
to work correctly at the highest baud rate!
So, my question is this: for those with ZipChips or TransWarps in II/II
+/IIe machines, does ADT as well as ADTPro fail at the highest baud
rate (115.2kbps)? Do people typically turn off acceleration for disk
image transfers? In other words, did I introduce a bug, or did things
always work this way?