Michael Black wrote:
That's because the "original poster" replied to a message that is over two and a half years old. At least google fixed their problem that allowed replies to old messages, it would seem that some news servers think nearly infinite retention is a good thing.
Actually, that seems fine to me. It's not like we're talking about tickets for tonight's show! It's not uncommon for a question to go unanswered, and I have no problem with it being answered ten years later! ;-) It's a good argument for sufficient quoting, though... -michael NadaPong: Network game demo for Apple II computers! Home page: http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/ "The wastebasket is our most important design tool--and it's seriously underused."