[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vintage disk drive dilema - to modify or not to modify
- Subject: Re: vintage disk drive dilema - to modify or not to modify
- From: Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:05:57 +0200
- Cancel-lock: sha1:VJkZhvlCi39rHL3iLp8Jg4VZasY=
- In-reply-to: <WRnLj.7895$Oa2.493@trndny06>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- References: <WRnLj.7895$Oa2.493@trndny06>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:33955
Mike Willegal schrieb:
I suspect that I could improve this drives performace by
increasing the resitance in the peak detection delay circuit to the
standard that was used in later disk drives. Most likely adding a 3k
reistor in series with R21 would do the job.
This increases the time constant of the first monoflop. In my schematic,
it's 9k1 / 330pF. Is this the 'original' value, or the new one you want
to achieve with your modification?
The datasheet values are 6k4 / 200pF.
Patrick
BTW: I would store the vintage drive at a safe place and use something
less valuable for daily work...