Re: My Vintage Computing Files Archive

[james <george@washington.edu>]

On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:54:37 -0700, "Michael J. Mahon"
<mjmahon@aol.com> wrote:

>+++james wrote:
>+++> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:49:46 -0700, magnusfalkirk
>+++> <dean.phares@gmail.com> wrote:
>+++> 
>+++> 
>+++>>+++On Jun 21, 2:11 pm, Chris Morse <win32...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+++>>+++> On Jun 21, 11:32 am, schmidtd <schmi...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>+++>>+++>
>+++>>+++> > On Jun 21, 12:18 am, hexstar <hexs...@gmail.com> wrote:> FAQ
>+++>>+++>
>+++>>+++> > How about... Where is the archive?  You seem to have neglected to tell
>+++>>+++> > us where to go in the first place.
>+++>>+++>
>+++>>+++> I found it here:http://vintage.tsfsc.com/the-archive/
>+++>>+++>
>+++>>+++> // CHRIS
>+++>>+++
>+++>>+++Interesting, the Apple II archive is simply a copy of the Asimov
>+++>>+++Archive.
>+++>>+++
>+++>>+++Dean
>+++> 
>+++> **************
>+++> 
>+++> That is all he is doing. Copying other archives and calling them his
>+++> own. 
>+++
>+++His rather lengthy text seemed to make a major point about the value
>+++of simply mirroring other's archives, so I don't get the impression
>+++that he is claiming ownership.
>+++
>+++In fact, he is correct--copying archives *is* a real value, since it
>+++improves availablility through distributed redundancy.
>+++
>+++-michael
>+++
>+++NadaNet: parallel computing for Apple II computers!
>+++Home page:  http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/
>+++
>+++"The wastebasket is our most important design
>+++tool--and it's seriously underused."
*****************

personally I don't care if he does or does not. 

james