On May 25, 3:37 am, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote: > > > Yep... The figures were right after all. > > Nope. YEP : > >>>Non-accelerated rates would be > >>>((6+4+2)*4+3)/4=12.75 cycles/byte -->> 78.43 KB/s (slightly unrolled) > >>>((6+4+2)*2+3)/2=13.50 cycles/byte -->> 74.07 KB/s (non-unrolled) > :-) --Jorge.