Re: The Apple 2 is rubbish !!!

[spike1@freenet.co.uk]

Sam Gillett <samgillettnospam@diespammermsn.com> did eloquently scribble:

> <a2fan@hotmail.com> wrote ...
>>
>> Ed Zagmoon wrote:
>>> The Commodore 64 is much better, the Apple 2 is just
>>> an oversized and expensive paperweight.
>>
>> You're right - the Commodore 64 is a MUCH better (more efficient), and
>> cheaper paperweight.

> The Sinclair Spectrum is an even better paperweight.  It is also a good
> doorstop.

Although nowhere near as good a doorstop as the commode64.
It had the bulk and weight on its side. And if you were stretched for
storage space, you could open it up and store your bread in it.
-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
|   spike1@freenet.co.uk   |                                                 |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| "ARSE! GERLS!! DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!"          |
|            in            | "THAT WOULD BE AN ECUMENICAL MATTER!...FECK!!!! |
|     Computer Science     | - Father Jack in "Father Ted"                   |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------