[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use MMX or SSE for Apple II
- Subject: Re: Use MMX or SSE for Apple II
- From: Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:40:39 +0100
- In-reply-to: <cdl5h.2387$6t.713@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Arcor
- References: <lKR4h.3421$IR4.2816@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net> <YLT4h.7956$9v5.6147@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> <455541f3$0$18838$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <cdl5h.2387$6t.713@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060911)
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:14773
Bryan Parkoff wrote:
>>> Also, the 64-bit C/C++ compilers don't allow
>>> inlined assembly instructions and so the entire routine will have to be
>>> done
>>> in asembly and linked in seperately.
>> *The* 64-bit compilers? All of them?
>
> Shawn is correct since I have read newsgroups at comp.lang.asm.x86 1-2
> years ago. It may be some reasons why inline asm is removed from C/C++
> Compiler when it is in 64 bit mode.
I highly doubt that inline assembly is disabled in the GNU Compiler
(gcc) for x86-64. All that gcc does anyway is to forward the stuff to
the same assembler that assembles its own output.
--
Linards