Re: Basic compiler

[Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de>]

Michael J. Mahon wrote:

> If you really feel you need the "level" of BASIC and the speed of
> machine language, then your best approximation will probably be one
> of the BASIC-like macro assembler packages.  I believe that Nibble
> offered such a package (maybe "Macrosoft"?).

If it doesn't have to be BASIC but you just don't want to use Assembly,
you could use the "cc65" C Cross-Compiler. The code it produces is still
inferior to hand assembly, but should be a good bit more optimal than
compiled BASIC.

-- 
Linards Ticmanis