Re: ADTgs issues

["Miles Attacca" <milesattacca@gmail.com>]

ADTPro seems to perform well enough for me. Having a side of a diskette
copied over in 40 seconds is nothing short of amazing if you forget the
fact that it's 1/10 the size of a modern 3.5"-er. :) Today I got
nostalgic and started playing Number Munchers just like I did on the
IIe in my first grade classroom (before the school tossed most of the
Apples out -- I was lucky to make off with the remaning IIGS, which is
why I'm here right now).


Linards Ticmanis wrote:
> schmidtd wrote:
>
> >> The other problem is the server, I never got around to doing the patches
> >> to any versions other than MS-DOS and Linux. I might take a stab at the
> >> ADTPro server, should also be a fairly minimal change.
> >
> > The trouble you will run into is with the ADTPro client.
>
> I don't plan on touching the ADTPro client. The ADTPro server works well
> with the original Non-Pro ADT 16-sector client, I just want to update it
> to work with the ADT 13-sector client as well.
>
> In fact the original ADT client, at least the 115.2 kbps version when
> run from a fast DOS 3.3 clone, is much faster than the ADTPro client on
> 5.25" disks. I see no reason to run ADTPro unless you're dealing with
> other kinds of images (such as 3.5", hard disk or CF card images).
> 
> Best wishes,
> -- 
> Linards Ticmanis