Re: Which assembler?

[Mark C <mark.c@somewhere.invalid>]

"Kallikak" <ken.wessen@gmail.com> wrote in
1151285723.076143.40400@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com:">news:1151285723.076143.40400@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com: 

> I'm after a 6502 assembler for my Apples, and am hoping for some
> advice on the best one to choose.  Although I realise it may not
> be possible for all my requirements to be met, here is what
> would be ideal: 
>   1.  Comes on a single disk,
>   2.  At least basic documentation is downloadable somewhere,
>   3.  Can run on a 64K Apple II+ (though I have a 128K IIe and a
>   IIc as 
> well)
>   4.  Uses a relatively standard syntax - e.g. hopefully things
>   like 
> LDA ($300),Y rather than LDAIY $300 etc
>   5.  I'm sure they'll all support symbols, macros aren't so
>   important 
> to me, but an include facility would be nice.

1) My first ever comp.sys.apple2 post, apologies if I say something 
stupid.

2) When I used to do assembler, I prefered the Big Mac assembler, 
which easily fits (IIRC) into 48KB.
(Of course this was a LONG time ago, pre //gs I think.)

A recent A.P.P.L.E. newsletter:
http://www.callapple.org/Members/magazine/2006/2006July15.pdf
... has news of Big Mac.

Mark