[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RGB's Pixel Misalignment
- Subject: RGB's Pixel Misalignment
- From: "Bryan Parkoff" <nospam@nospam.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:12:12 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
- Reply-to: "Bryan Parkoff" <nospam@nospam.com>
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:9784
Hello,
It is about Apple //e's 80 col & RGB card. I know that I have been
discussing for a while. I find this interesting why pixel position is in
misalignment. I wonder if Matt knows the answer.
Think about Apple IIgs. DHGR can set color and monochrome while it
remains in the same position 0 through position 559 however Apple //e's 80
col & RGB card does not.
When you set monochrome only or color only, it stays in position 0
through 559. If you set mixed monochrome and color, it is in position 0
through 563. Between position 560 and position 563 have extra 4 pixels.
Left pixels are in monochrome and right pixels are in color. I have
unexplained answer why Video 7 decides to do it. It should be in position 0
through position 559 without any extra 4 pixels. In my opinion, 80 column
text might be unreadable in monochrome when it is very closer beside to the
color pixel's edges.
You may notice that four lines in 80 column is in position 0 through
position 559 while LGR in column is in position 7 through position 566.
Can you please provide your opinion? Is it possible that Video 7 made
mistake to design RGB card? Or...it was up to their decision how to design
it?
Bryan Parkoff