[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Crystal confirmation...

Subject: Re: Crystal confirmation...
From: Mark McDougall <markm@vl.com.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:15:23 +1000
In-reply-to: <4491ae30$0$4511$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <1150381980.208940.118060@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1150386826.116186.214340@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <4491ae30$0$4511$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:9312

Linards Ticmanis wrote:

I wonder, why isn't it a 14.318181818... MHz but slightly off?


Probably because it was cheaper/easier to get at the time?!?

Over 51.2us (video data time for 1 NTSC scan line) 14.318180 and14.31863MHz clocks BOTH produce 733 cycles, so it won't matter which isused.


Regards,

--
Mark McDougall, Engineer
Virtual Logic Pty Ltd, <http://www.vl.com.au>
21-25 King St, Rockdale, 2216
Ph: +612-9599-3255 Fax: +612-9599-3266

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Crystal confirmation...
  - From: "Nama" <lord_philip@mac.com>

References:
- Crystal confirmation...
  - From: "Nama" <lord_philip@mac.com>
- Re: Crystal confirmation...
  - From: "Tom Greene" <tom@cowgod.org>
- Re: Crystal confirmation...
  - From: Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft " SoftCard " CP/M Reference Manual
Next by Date: Re: Supercard
Previous by thread: Re: Crystal confirmation...
Next by thread: Re: Crystal confirmation...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread