In article <usKdnWPSDo9AChfZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com> wrote:
Video transcoding is an "embarrassingly parallel" application, yet
I have not found a single popular software manufacturer that makes
a parallel transcoder. With all the multicore chips now, they are
leaving factors of performance on the table.
Apparently, the market for video encoders does not evaluate them
on performance--astonishingly. Some of the most popular perform
terribly.
I take it by popular, you mean Windows only. Apple's Final Cut Studio
is multi-processor/core aware, including the video compression stuff.
(PPC or Intel) You can also set up the Compressor app to do clustering
and use unused cycles from other computers, at least for rendering
scenes. Don't know offhand if it does it for compression, but it'll use
multiple processors in the machine it's running on.
Maybe with Final Cut being popular amongst professionals doesn't count?
Greg B.
PS. Apple has had multi-processor/core Macs available since August 2000
so there is a lot of software on the Mac that will take advantage of
such things. Especially under OS X...
PPS. It'd be nice if Quicktime would support multiple processors/cores,
but it doesn't. :-(