[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WDC 65C02

Subject: Re: WDC 65C02
From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:11:02 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.atari.8bit
References: <dLIUf.550$t22.534@dukeread08> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0603232127260.29184@static-141-149-129-16.buff.east.verizon.net> <otCdndrMMK2w_b7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@comcast.com> <f62dncCAOPPu9b7ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comcast.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:5819 comp.sys.atari.8bit:2697

"Vince Briel" <vbriel@removethisspamcamcast.net> wrote in message 
f62dncCAOPPu9b7ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comcast.com">news:f62dncCAOPPu9b7ZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Yes, it is compatible electrically, and no,
>> the WDC is in a PLCC package.
>>
>> Bill Garber
>
> Huh? I have 40 pin DIP WDC chips. I've bought 40 pin DIP directly from 
> WDC.


Yeah, sorry. I don't know what I was thinking.

> I haven't directly tested the WDC 65C02 in all II's but in a IIe it should 
> work just fine. I had problems getting some 65C02's to work in the IIplus. 
> I seem to remember RAM not liking it.

True some work in the II+, some don't.  :o)

Bill Garber

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WDC 65C02
  - From: "BLuRry" <brendan.robert@gmail.com>

References:
- WDC 65C02
  - From: "Jack Tseng" <tseng4@hotmail.com>
- Re: WDC 65C02
  - From: Lyrical Nanoha <LyricalNanoha@dosius.ath.cx>
- Re: WDC 65C02
  - From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: WDC 65C02
  - From: "Vince Briel" <vbriel@removethisspamcamcast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: WDC 65C02
Next by Date: Re: WDC 65C02
Previous by thread: Re: WDC 65C02
Next by thread: Re: WDC 65C02
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread