Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> wrote:
Maybe. It's good enough for music tapes though. And I noticed that the
Apple tape played much less loud than the new copy I produced with the
Commodore Datasette in an early attempt to get this working. Do tapes
get softer over time as the magnetization averages itself out maybe? Or
maybe Apple tapes are just by nature less loud than Commodore tapes.
[...]
The alignment doesn't have to be off by much to degrade the high
frequency response enough to bother the Apple read routine. I have
also encountered "professionally" duplicated cassettes that were
recorded with bad alignment--I had to misalign a deck to recover
the data from that one!
You can see some screen shots of a WAV file on http://www.fadden.com/fft/
from a piece of an Apple II tape. The page is actually about a buggy
FFT filter implementation, but it shows the sort of distortion that
accumulates over time. The Apple II relies on zero crossings, and in
some cases low-frequency noise pushes the signal completely above or
below zero.
I don't actually know *where* the noise comes from. It could be
related to my decidedly non-studio-grade equipment, but it doesn't show
up on all tapes.