[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?

Subject: Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:25:00 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <U4idnTCy4K0l2T_eRVn-pA@ll.net><YPqdnQUuUccBnz7eRVn-ug@rogers.com> <o6udnaUG0fFynj7enZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@rogers.com> <58KdnYz2J9j0FT7eRVn-iw@ll.net> <rvadnZNYLeXOQD7enZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com> <bLqdnZ1bU8f5kDnenZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@comcast.com> <1134845666.543714.109120@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:7714

"julian814" <julian814@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
1134845666.543714.109120@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com">news:1134845666.543714.109120@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Bill, I had you work on my //c hard drive a while back, weren't you
> able to get some idea on how to reverse engineer it? Or didn't you have
> it long enough?


The plan was to repair and return, which I did. I didn't want
to hold it longer than necessary.

Bill Garber

References:
- chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
  - From: "brad" <mrbrad(remove)@ll.net>
- Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
  - From: Glenn Jones <rg.jones@rogers.com>
- Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
  - From: Glenn Jones <rg.jones@rogers.com>
- Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
  - From: "brad" <mrbrad(remove)@ll.net>
- Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>
- Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
  - From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
  - From: "julian814" <julian814@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Mix LGR and Text?
Next by Date: Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
Previous by thread: Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
Next by thread: Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread