Re: Question:The internal 3 1/2 drive on the //c+

[Sean Fahey <a2fan@hotmail.com>]

Ed Eastman wrote:
> Lockar wrote:
>
> >     The Apple //c+ did not use a UniDisk 3.5 drive.
>
>
> Um, does not _require_ a unidisk, but it is an option.  As it stands, 
> the IIc+ has essentially extra hardware on the main board to cache the 
> data coming from the 'dumb' 3.5" drive to replicate the function of the 
>  unidisk controller board inside the Unidisk drives.

Ed, he was saying the //c+ internal drive isn't a UniDisk - but implying 
it was more like a Apple 3.5 drive - because we had a misunderstanding 
earlier in the thread about what drive could do bit copying.