[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion (was Re: apple iie overheat question)
- Subject: Re: To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion (was Re: apple iie overheat question)
- From: "anoneds@netscape.net" <anoneds@netscape.net>
- Date: 7 May 2005 17:50:02 -0700
- Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
- In-reply-to: <m3sm0yhha9.fsf@pearl.local>
- Injection-info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=63.17.171.70; posting-account=eL7mewwAAABmqqXELpgC8WibfFSSqJXz
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: http://groups.google.com
- References: <3yNee.7639$BE3.859@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net> <cvPee.38$r04.117@news.oracle.com> <xTPee.11819$tQ.9886@fed1read06> <m3wtqcgifm.fsf@pearl.local> <J2.j2.6b2LI2FUGqaYyib.NR@aqu.candybar.ne.jp> <m3sm0yhha9.fsf@pearl.local>
- User-agent: G2/0.2
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:10819
Scott Hemphill wrote:
<snip>
>
> I was hoping that somebody would bite on my direct calculation for
the
> Fibonacci sequence, wondering where my "magic constants" came from,
and
> why it works. I guess most people either already know, or don't
care.
>
Hmm. Well, I care! :)
Please, elaborate? I haven't had a chance to even try it, yet!
Ben