[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latest sample of Crate.Synth music
In article <NPmdnQVz_7DkEdDfRVn-3g@comcast.com>,
Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> I would have been content to be blown away by the first version, but by
>> now you've got to the point where any further refinement would just be
>> "showing off" ;-)
>
>;-) Thanks!
>
>I admit to being pretty blown away myself when it worked!
>
>Now I have to strike a balance between "proof of concept" and "fully
>developed" to figure out when to stop fiddling with it and leave it
>to others to develop, if they wish.
>
>My current thinking is that I need to get multiple voices fully
>supported and demonstrated (including "expression", or multiple
>attack amplitudes), and the special class of fixed-pitch sampled
>voices (percussion). All these fit nicely into the existing framework.
>
>
>BTW, it has been interesting to treat the Applecrate and NadaNet as
>"just works" infrastructure during synthesizer development. It is
>a nice shift of perspective to go from working on something to just
>using it to do something else. And I'm happy to report that I find
>it quite usable. ;-)
>
>-michael
So, when is GarageBand ][ going to ready for the 'Craters'? ;-)
--Steve
--
--Steve (apple2pd@ground.ecn.uiowa.edu)