[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple II LCD screenshots
- Subject: Re: Apple II LCD screenshots
- From: "Sean Fahey" <a2fan@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:10:56 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
- References: <1grufev.ed7j4l18nzu5eN%email@DELETE_THIS.luddite.no-ip.com> <xX1Qd.9561$D34.7891@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <Ro-dnRTJkcvMlozfRVn-hg@comcast.com>
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:8503
"Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com> wrote in message
Ro-dnRTJkcvMlozfRVn-hg@comcast.com">news:Ro-dnRTJkcvMlozfRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> > Must be the LCD panel - 80 columns on mine looks fine, just very small.
Your
> > screen is composite only? Mine takes VGA too - that might make the
> > difference.
>
> It's not the LCD panel _only_.
>
> Sharp 80-column displays are impossble with NTSC color processing.
That's obvious... we've repeated that, probably dozens of times in various
threads over the past month. My point, is that a monitor designed for VGA
will probably feature higher resolution than one designed soley (only) for
composite input.